This seems to use: line=light_rail for S(tadt)-Bahn, when I think the schema suggests line=rail+service=commuter
Were you going to pick up any of the service=* types, or is it too early for that? Richard On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Melchior Moos <melchiorm...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > 2009/7/8 Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com> > > The public transport schema says we should be tagging rail service >> relations as: >> >> No route tag >> line=rail >> service = high_speed / long_distance / regional / commuter >> ref = service reference >> nat_ref = national timetable reference >> >> Whereas oepnv-karte is seems to be rendering on the basis of: >> green for route=light_rail (being used for S-Bahn, ie service=commuter) >> yellow for route=train (being used for pretty much everything else) >> brown for route=railway (being used for odd leftover bits) >> >> The schema seems to allow the use of relations for infrastructure (use >> route=railway), but does not particularly encourage that. >> >> I would take it that actually the best approach is to tag as per the >> schema (using an Operator code for the ref until we think of something >> better), and hope/assume Melchior adds rendering support in due course? >> > > > > The tagging schema mentioned above is also supported. There is a list of > the recongnised tags available in the wiki (for now only in german, if > you're interested I will tanslate it): > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/%C3%96pnvkarte#Linien > > regards, > Melchior >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
