Frederik Ramm <frede...@...> writes: >Is anybody sure that the OS's attribution requirements are adequately >addressed by current practice, and when moving to ODbL later? > >Under ODbL it will be possible to use non-substantial amounts of data >from OSM without any attribution (this is not disputed), and furthermore >(this is disputed and the following is only the opinion of myself plus >at least one member of the licensing working group) it will be possible >to create a produced work from OSM data and license that under a license >that does not require attribution, so attribution can become lost "down >the line".
I don't think this matters; if someone else infringes the attribution requirement isn't that between them and OS? We have done our part. -- Ed Avis <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
