Good stuff - thanks for the link Ed. ITO suggest that OSM is 65% complete in the City of Bristol, which is almost the same as my 37% incomplete statistic! The discrepancy probably occurs because: 1) I'm using a different algorithm to ITO 2) ITO and my data will not be from the same time 3) My data is not strictly speaking the City of Bristol - there's also parts of South Glos included so that Filton and Bradley Stoke show up in the stats, and I've removed Avonmouth from the bounding box...
I'd also like to echo the statements that I don't think the map is complete if it aligns with the OSL data. However, I use the maps with Navit (for sat-nav), so having the streets and names in there are more important to me than perhaps to others. Each to their own! How about 'street-complete' for another term? That probably doesn't cut it either.... Tim --- On Sat, 24/7/10, SomeoneElse <[email protected]> wrote: From: SomeoneElse <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Bristol - a quick (and surprising?) statistic... To: [email protected] Date: Saturday, 24 July, 2010, 16:26 On 24/07/2010 15:16, Dave F. wrote: > That link sends me back to the homepage & I'm unable to find the summary > page. Do you have another link? I think that that's a bit of a feature of the way that the site works - if you're logged in and aren't signed up to "OSM Analysis" that seems to be what happens. If you logout and subscribe (perhaps by "http://www.itoworld.com/static/product_subscribe?product=OSM%20Analysis"; it should work). _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
