Reported him/her, adding a couple of most egregious edits/comments. It
takes only a couple of minutes.

Kind regards,
Igor

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 11:28 PM martianfreeloader <
martianfreeloa...@posteo.net> wrote:

> Anyone who can spare a half hour, please report 4KK as soon as possible!
>
> As the account is not only insulting people but actively destroying the
> map, it seems that time is of the essence.
>
> Apparently, the account also engages in edit wars:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342087384/history
>
> I have little capacity for OSM at the moment, sorry; otherwise I'd do it
> myself.
>
> Thanks to Damjan Gerl for bringing this up and to everyone who
> contributed to the discussion so far!
> m
>
>
>
> On 03/11/2022 19:16, pitastr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Report_user
> >
> > We can report to data, “ат”openstreetmap.org for vandalism and report
> > the user in a separate section. We should take all the below evidence
> > and forward it to the mentioned email. *
> > *
> >
> > On 03/11/2022 19:11, Igor Brejc wrote:
> >> What's the procedure here? How do we report this?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022, 17:59 martianfreeloader
> >> <martianfreeloa...@posteo.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Another inappropriate changeset comment from just yesterday:
> >>
> >>     https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128392452
> >>
> >>
> >>     On 03/11/2022 17:17, Igor Brejc wrote:
> >>     > Hi,
> >>     >
> >>     > Even if nothing else, he should be reported for that insulting
> >>     comment
> >>     > on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121494577
> >>     > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121494577>, this isn't
> >>     just
> >>     > vandalism, but pure abusive behavior.
> >>     >
> >>     > Cheers,
> >>     > Igor
> >>     >
> >>     > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 4:47 PM martianfreeloader
> >>     > <martianfreeloa...@posteo.net
> >>     <mailto:martianfreeloa...@posteo.net>> wrote:
> >>     >
> >>     >     Hi,
> >>     >
> >>     >     I think the account 4KK should be reported for vandalism.
> >>     >
> >>     >     TLDR:
> >>     >     - 4KK destroys the map.
> >>     >     - When confronted with their behaviour, they either don't
> >>     reply at all
> >>     >     or in an insulting way.
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >     Long version:
> >>     >
> >>     >     History of 4KK:
> >>     >     - The account was created in 2017.
> >>     >     - Strong mapping activity only started in Feb 2022
> >>     >
> >>     >     A list of the changesets that have been discussed by other
> >>     users:
> >>     >
> https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6270480
> >>     >
> >>      <
> https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6270480>
> >>     >
> >>     >     Comments made by other mappers to 4KK's changesets:
> >>     >     - 11 changesets of 4KK are discussed by other users (since
> >>     April 2022)
> >>     >     - All 11 changesets have been critized by other mappers as
> >>     seriously
> >>     >     and
> >>     >     clearly wrong. (with mixed degrees politeness, but nothing
> >>     off the
> >>     >     spectrum of normal OSM demeanor)
> >>     >
> >>     >     4KK's reaction:
> >>     >     - To 9 of these comments, 4KK did not reply at all.
> >>     >     - To 1 changeset, 4KK replied in a polite but
> >>     nonconstructive way:
> >>     > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126707625
> >>     >     <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126707625>
> >>     >     - To 1 changeset, 4KK replied with an insult and nothing
> >>     substantial:
> >>     > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121494577
> >>     >     <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121494577>
> >>     >     (I think that this incident alone would already justify
> >>     deletion of the
> >>     >     account)
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >     I did not check the actual mapping content of these
> >>     changesets, so I
> >>     >     can't tell whether all the other mappers were always right
> >>     with their
> >>     >     criticism. But given that 4KK has been repeatedly drawn
> >>     criticism by
> >>     >     various users, I assume they are right.
> >>     >
> >>     >     Personally, I had one instance myself where I discovered
> >>     that 4KK
> >>     >     mapped
> >>     >     a completely fictional motorway (in fact most credits go to
> >>     >     scabiosa_trenta), but I didn't make this public at the time
> >>     because I
> >>     >     didn't see the broader picture.
> >>     >
> >>     >     Best,
> >>     >     m
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >     On 26/10/2022 23:50, Miha Pavšič via Talk-si wrote:
> >>     >      > Živjo,
> >>     >      >
> >>     >      > ja, že prej je to počel (recimo 9 mesecev nazaj). Sam sem
> >>     najprej
> >>     >     opazil relacijo "Razvojna os 3A Ljubljana-Kočevje”, kjer je
> >>     vrisal
> >>     >     “proposed” cesto od razcepa Malence naprej, kot vir pa navedel
> >>     >     novico iz leta 2015. Gre samo za neko staro idejo, ki se je
> >>     takrat
> >>     >     pojavila, ampak je vsaj na začetnem delu nerealistična in se
> >>     o njej
> >>     >     sploh ne govori več. Bila je idejna zasnova, sploh ne nekaj
> >>     >     načrtovanega, in kot taka zadeva po mojem nima kaj iskati v
> OSM.
> >>     >     Kako pa bi izgledalo, če bi vsak risal neke idejne zasnove?
> >>     >      >
> >>     >      > Skratka, changeset sem pokomentiral (letoss septembra),
> >>     >     komentarja z njegove strani ni bilo, pa tudi na moje sporočilo
> >>     >     direktno njemu ni odgovoril.
> >>     >      >
> >>     >      > Lep pozdrav,
> >>     >      > Miha
> >>     >      >
> >>     >      >> On 26 Oct 2022, at 17:58, Damjan Gerl <dam...@damjan.net
> >>     >     <mailto:dam...@damjan.net>> wrote:
> >>     >      >>
> >>     >      >> Prosim napiši kakšno opombo na changeset, tako da bo tam
> >>     "javno"
> >>     >     odgovoril (če bo), da bomo vsaj videli kaj/kako odgovori. In
> >>     lahko
> >>     >     dobi tudi več odgovorov drugih osm-erjev.
> >>     >      >>
> >>     >      >> Potem pa se lahko ukrepa in vpraša, da ga iz osm-boarda
> >>     opomnijo
> >>     >     ali začasno blokirajo, če je potrebno.
> >>     >      >>
> >>     >      >> LP,
> >>     >      >> Damjan
> >>     >      >>
> >>     >      >>  From "Blaž Lorger" blaz.lor...@krs.net
> >>     <mailto:blaz.lor...@krs.net>
> >>     >      >> To talk-si@openstreetmap.org
> >>     <mailto:talk-si@openstreetmap.org>
> >>     >      >> Cc Date Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:35:56 +0200
> >>     >      >> Subject [Talk-si] "izboljšave" uporabnika 4KK
> >>     >      >>
> >>     >      >>
> >>     >      >> Mogoče ste že opazili da je v zadnjih dneh uporabnik 4KK
> >>     >     (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/4KK
> >>     >     <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/4KK>) naredil več
> >>     sprememb na
> >>     >     področju Slovenije.
> >>     >      >> Kakšna je pozitivna, so pa tudi neustrezne.
> >>     >      >> Zgleda se je koncentriral na ceste pri tem pa je
> >>     spremenil tudi
> >>     >     precej relacij. Zaradi površnega dela so vsaj nekatere izmed
> teh
> >>     >     relacij zdaj nepravilne. Kot na primer ta turn restriction
> >>     >     (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2653752/history
> >>     >     <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2653752/history>).
> >>     Zdaj je
> >>     >     legalno narediti oster zavoj in se vrniti v krožišče.
> >>     >      >>
> >>     >      >> Na moj poziv naj popravi take napake je jasno odgovoril
> >>     da tega
> >>     >     ne namerava storiti.
> >>     >      >> Predlagam da se lotite popravljanja.
> >>     >      >>
> >>     >      >> Pozdrav,
> >>     >      >>    Blaž
> >>     >      >>
> >>     >      >> _______________________________________________
> >>     >      >> Talk-si mailing list
> >>     >      >> Talk-si@openstreetmap.org <mailto:
> Talk-si@openstreetmap.org>
> >>     >      >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si
> >>     >     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si>
> >>     >      >
> >>     >      >
> >>     >      > _______________________________________________
> >>     >      > Talk-si mailing list
> >>     >      > Talk-si@openstreetmap.org <mailto:
> Talk-si@openstreetmap.org>
> >>     >      > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si
> >>     >     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si>
> >>     >
> >>     >     _______________________________________________
> >>     >     Talk-si mailing list
> >>     > Talk-si@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-si@openstreetmap.org>
> >>     > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si
> >>     >     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si>
> >>     >
> >>
> >>     _______________________________________________
> >>     Talk-si mailing list
> >>     Talk-si@openstreetmap.org
> >>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Talk-si mailing list
> >> Talk-si@openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-si mailing list
> > Talk-si@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-si mailing list
> Talk-si@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-si mailing list
Talk-si@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si

Reply via email to