I agree.

-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 12:18 PM
To: Pamela Dominguez; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!

until i hear an official announcement window-eyes is not dead. it's the
thread that never ends...it goes on and on and on and on and on my
friends...




On 12/18/2016 12:14 PM, Pamela Dominguez via Talk wrote:
> Well then if that's true, then why are the window eyes people still 
> selling it?  Pam.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Russ Kiehne via Talk
> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 9:50 AM
> To: brice Mijares ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>
>        And lets add to that.  How about several employees leaving Ai 
> Squared.  The VFO group has ask the dealers to stop selling Window-Eyes.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: brice Mijares via Talk
> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 6:35 PM
> To: [email protected] ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>
> I been a window eyes user since the 90's and earlier this week I sent 
> support a question and still haven't heard back from them. What does 
> this tell you?
>
> On 12/17/2016 6:08 PM, Jim via Talk wrote:
>> Hi there FOLKS!
>>
>> Well I seem to have addressed this issue just a few days ago, as far 
>> as I know Window-Eyes is going no where in the near or intermediate
>> future.  I really cannot say as much for the long run.   I called about
>> obtaining a new LTO and they are still selling them and plan to for 
>> the future as far as that goes.  So Please do not start this BS about 
>> Window-Eyes being dead again.  That, I can say I would GREATLY 
>> APPRECIATE!. <KF8LT><Jim Wohlgamuth>
>>
>>
>> On 17-Dec-16 20:27, Dave via Talk wrote:
>>> Veronica, for me it is more of a personal thing.  JAWS does a very 
>>> good job at reading screens, and in some cases it does a better job 
>>> than Window Eyes.
>>>
>>> But, JAWS in my experience has very poor Support for its program, 
>>> and they always want Money Money Money for their latest and greatest 
>>> upgrade, and sometimes their latest upgrade is more like an Update, 
>>> andcx isn't all that much better than what you had bfore you spend 
>>> an extra $200.
>>> Then
>>> they put a Copywrite protection on their program so an owner has 
>>> trouble installing on more than one or two Systems.
>>>
>>> And JAWS always seemed to be just a bit Buggy, and I hate it when I 
>>> loose speech, and I cannot tell if it was Window Eyes or something 
>>> else in my system that caused the system lock up.
>>>
>>> I am Joking, but I do understand that Blind people are all Thieves 
>>> and we would steal the Copper Penny's covering our dear 
>>> Grandmother's eyes, as she awaits her funeral, if we only could find 
>>> her without someone taking our hand and leading us up to the old girl.
>>>
>>> Of course JAWS selling their program for over $1000 has nothing to 
>>> do with the desperation of many who are Blind.
>>>   Here is something to think about-
>>> I am going to go out to the Computer Store tonight, and Purchase a 
>>> Quad Core 3.4 I5 System with 16 GB of RAM,  and a 750 GB Hard Drive, 
>>> for $250.
>>>
>>> We have a store here called Re-PC that takes in used systems, tests 
>>> them and puts them up for sale.
>>> So I can buy a used system for $250, and I think the Pro edition of 
>>> JAWS is over $1200, maybe someone here can correct this figure.
>>>
>>> When the Screen Reader costs four or almost five times as much as 
>>> the computer it will run upon, guess I have a problem with that.
>>>
>>> And I know JAWS is a Company that is to make a profit for the 
>>> owners, and making a healthy profit is something I have no problem 
>>> with a Company doing.  But there is the Greed factor that tends to 
>>> raise its uglyhead, and that is when a Company will charge what they 
>>> believe the Market will bare.  And with most program sales getting 
>>> paid for by our Government, the same government that will pay $600 
>>> for a Toilet Seat, why not charge Uncle SAM $1200 for a screen 
>>> Reader program? After all, Uncle SAM is good for it, even though few 
>>> people who are Blind can afford it, with most living on minimum wage 
>>> jobs, or some level of Social Security.
>>>
>>> JAWS as a program, does many things right, and even better than 
>>> Window Eyes, in some cases.
>>>
>>> I just never liked their method of doing business, or how they 
>>> interacted with their customers.
>>>
>>> I stayed with GW Micro largely because they were a great group of 
>>> people to work and deal with when you needed to do so.  From the 
>>> days of DOS to just before the purchasing of GW Micro by A I Squared  
>>> I felt their customer service and program support was very very 
>>> good.  And there were times when the guys could not fix what ever my 
>>> issue was at the time.
>>> But, they didn't just ignore my situation, or mock me for having a 
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> I almost always found Window Eyes to be a very reliable program, and 
>>> so when I did have those times when my system would freeze or lock 
>>> up, I was prone to think it was Internet Exploder, or some other 
>>> program, including Windows Itself  to be the culprit before I considered
the
>>> Screen Reader.   That is the very high level of reliability I came to
>>> expect from GW Micro, because that is what they produced for years.
>>>
>>> Today, I do not have the same degree of Faith in those who run GW 
>>> Micro.
>>> And I do not know if this is only because some of the old staff are 
>>> now gone, and those replacing them are not quite as good, or if what 
>>> I sense is the hand of the Parent Company influencing how those who 
>>> still work at GW Micro do their jobs.  And now that A I Squared has 
>>> been swallowed by the Parent Company of JAWS, there is even a 
>>> greater distance theTop
>>> decision makers  have from the every day user of Window Eyes.    So it
>>> takes longer and longer to fix problems, or to make alterations to 
>>> Window Eyes etc.
>>>
>>> Personally, I need a powerful Screen Reader.  I use NVDA on 
>>> occasion, but it is not powerful enough to do everything I need from 
>>> a Screen Reader.  There may come a Day when I must buy my own copy 
>>> of JAWS.  I won't like it, but if they are the only Game in town, then
what choice
>>> do I have?    I will reluctantly make my purchase.
>>>
>>> Grumpy Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
>>> the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>>
>>> For membership options, visit
>>>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/wohlggie%40gma
il.com. 
>>>
>>>
>>> For subscription options, visit
>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>> List archives can be found at
>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
>> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>
>> For membership options, visit
>>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/bricemijares%4
0att.net. 
>>
>>
>> For subscription options, visit
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>> List archives can be found at
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit
>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/russ94577%40gm
ail.com. 
>
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit
>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/geodom%40opton
line.net.
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7924 / Virus Database: 4739/13610 - Release Date: 
> 12/18/16
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit
>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/rascal0826%40v
erizon.net.
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dennisl1982%40
gmail.com.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to