-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Frederik Ramm wrote: > Thomas Schäfer wrote: >> Discussions about Ipv6 is not wasted hot air. It is related to osm, because >> osm should be based on it, but isn't. It shoud simply be done, then is no >> further discussion about it. > > Let's be pragmatic here like we usually are. If we were to switch to > IPv6 today (which I understand we can't but let's assume we could), what > part of OSM would work better tomorrow?
- - We could instantly move to distributed tilecaches automatically routed to the closed tileserver available. - - Likewise for a read only api - - For the people that have multicasting available we could create a stream of changesets that everyone that subscribes gets I can think of much more... Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREKAAYFAkpLxBYACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn3nlQCfa5/PvSXTGMJO5ExgjRbB+4KV jtYAn1s3A97DN/Oa4V9EBO6BulyOD+Lp =dlaj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
