Am Mittwoch 01 Juli 2009 schrieb Frederik Ramm: > Hi, > > Thomas Schäfer wrote: > > Discussions about Ipv6 is not wasted hot air. It is related to osm, > > because osm should be based on it, but isn't. It shoud simply be done, > > then is no further discussion about it. > > Let's be pragmatic here like we usually are. If we were to switch to > IPv6 today (which I understand we can't but let's assume we could), what > part of OSM would work better tomorrow?
We ensure that also the first ipv6-only computers can access osm too. It is not the question of to be better. The question of to be. For sotm we have "OSI Scholarships program" . It is similar with ipv6. If we don't want to lose the last mapper in 'especially developing countries' we should enable ipv6. Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
