On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 13:47:26 +0000 Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Many words, long story short: technology-wise, OpenStreetMap core is > dead. This sounds bad and it is hard for me to discuss other examples, but in > "I'm worried about this. I have not performed a technical review." as > a blocker for PR merge: > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/2939 - quote is manipulated (it skips part that changes meaning - it is not reason for closing PR, this reviewer is simply not making full review and signaling that he is worried about impact) - it is not a blocker - others may still review and accept it - why you claim "There is no development outside of a limited set of companies" and give openstreetmap-carto as an example? - why you claim "It is impossible to get anything merged into core infrastructure" and give openstreetmap-carto later as an example? > Basically, most of wide ~2011 dev community was hired away, and core > is in hands of those who weren't hired away by Map* for whatever > reason, be that lack of social skills or lack of technical skills. > You've got no fresh blood, and there's no road map for it to improve. Again, why you claim this and give openstreetmap-carto as an example? Project that started in 2013 ( https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/graphs/contributors )? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
