Richard, in both languages, the main issue is the same. It says that the discussion has restarted with the negative commentary, but skips the main point - that the tool has been substantially reworked based on community feedback. It's like saying some people got rich without mentioning the bank rubbery. And it alleges that the tool is a "hidden mechanical edit tool", (GTranslate) which is simply untrue - unless they are claiming that existing tools are also that.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote: > joost schooupe wrote: > > It doesn't help that it was worded as "people are > > saying", but then the last part of the sentence seems more > > like their own opinion. > > Worth noting that WeeklyOSM is produced alongside and seeded by the German > Wochennotiz. I don't sprechen sufficient Deutsch to be certain, but it > looks > like the German original[1] is more carefully worded and less presumptuous. > So the controversial second half is very possibly just a clumsy > translation. > > Reading back through this whole discussion, those of us fortunate enough to > be born with the world's international language as our mother tongue could, > perhaps, be more forgiving of those who weren't. > > Richard > > [1] http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/11/wochennotiz-nr-382/ > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
