--- In [email protected], "Edi Tarigan (aka Mosokul)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mejuah-juah man banta kerina,
mjj > > Koperasi itu bagus dan sangat handal utk bisa dijadikan tools untuk > memajukan masyarakat. Memang pelaksanaannya di Indonesia sejak dulu > tidak seindah konsepnya. Kurasa itu karena memang karena manusia > pelaksana-nya. Seperti biasanya berbagai hal yg "dicoba" di > implementasikan di Indonesia, sering sekali tidak berhasil bukan > karena hal apa2 tapi karena pelaksana/manusia nya. mantab kali kurasa baca tulisan bang edi ini. jaman dulu, koperasi gagal memang karena SDM dan training programnya yang kurang lengkap, begitu kata Bung Hatta. Jamanya Soeharto, ide koperasi dan pemikiran hatta lainya ingin dihidupkan lagi oleh Pak Adi Sasono, sempat waktu itu beliau dikataken "The Most Dangerous Indonesian Men". Adi Sasono is an engineer and cuts an unassuming profile. A slightly built and soft-spoken figure, he is referred to by some critics as "Indonesia's most dangerous man". This is because of his aggressive advocacy of what he calls "the People's Economy". He want to break the economic stranglehold of the country's traditionally powerful commercial conglomerates and redistribute the wealth to small businesses and the 50,000 or so co-operatives which are mostly state-run. He calls that "justice" in a country where 99% of businesses turn over Rp1 billion ($113,000) per annum or less. Large businesses with an annual turnover of Rp50 bn or more make up just two-tenths of 1% of all commercial companies in Indonesia. But they control 61% of Indonesia's GDP. Ide koperasi saat ini sering dianggap sebagai bagian dari satu framework Distributism Economic Philosopy dimana Distributism dianggap bisa mengurangi efek negatif kapitalisme dan sosialisme : dari wikipedia: Distributism is a third-way economic philosophy formulated by such Roman Catholic thinkers as G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc to apply the principles of Catholic Social Teaching articulated by the Roman Catholic Church. According to distributism, the ownership of the means of production should be spread as widely as possible among the general populace, rather than being centralized under the control of the state (socialism) or wealthy private individuals (capitalism). A summary of distributism is found in Chesterton's statement: "Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists." Essentially, distributism distinguishes itself by its distribution of property. Distributism holds that, while socialism allows no individuals to own productive property (it all being under state, community, or workers' control), and capitalism allows only a few to own it, distributism itself seeks to ensure that most people will become owners of productive property. As Hilaire Belloc stated, the distributive state (that is, the state which has implemented distributism) contains "an agglomeration of families of varying wealth, but by far the greater number of owners of the means of production."[4] This broader distribution does not extend to all property, but only to productive property; that is, that property which produces wealth, namely, the things needed for man to survive. It includes land, tools, etc.[5] Distributism has often been described as a third way of economic order between socialism and capitalism. However, some have seen it more as an aspiration, which has been successfully realised in the short term by commitment to the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity (these being built into financially independent local co-operatives).
