On Saturday, April 30, 2011, 5:04:39 AM, Mark Partous wrote: > As you can see, I'm still using 4.2.44.2 (and should go back > because 4.2.44.2 suffers from the problem with images on > https servers) because I don't have the time, nor the setup to > simply test it on a non-productive setup. Based upon the > messages I can read here, I would not have relased 5 if I were > Ritlabs, but I as a user of 4, I also decide not to use 5 > until the features I need and already have in 4 seem to work properly in 5.
another thing which I am confused about is users who threaten to or do leave because a feature is causing trouble but it doesn't exist in the product they move to. For example, the mail tracker. Disclaimer: haven't used for years. Anyhow, apparently there are currently some frustrating problems with it. So user abandons bat, to go to another software which doesn't have buggy tracker, because has no tracker at all. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882 Using IMAP with The Bat! 5.0.9.7 (BETA) on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service Pack 2) ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.9.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
