Hello Thomas, Wednesday, May 6, 2020, 10:42:23 PM, you wrote:
> The sender's MUA is the webmailer at qq.com, one of the biggest email > providers in China. I would think that TB should accommodate their > flaw, as other receiving MUAs do. With all due respect, no MUA should accommodate to a bug of a single provider gone rogue. To quote Maxim (see https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=1791#c6045) M> This is intentional behaviour, to address the Mailsploit issue. M> See https://www.mailsploit.com/index M> M> The address lines in From and Reply-to do not have a part surrounded M> by <>, that is used by mail transfer agents, which do not decode M> headers. Thus in this case The Bat! should also not decode such M> headers. Otherwise, it would have allowed effective sender spoofing in The Bat! ... > Unless Ritlabs can change China, TheBat becomes unusable for business. Let's reduce scope of generalisation here. Until this sentence point of discussion was a single mail server, not a country. -- Regards, A ________________________________________________________ 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
