Saturday, November 06, 1999
Hello Douglas,
Saturday, Saturday, November 06, 1999, you wrote:
Douglas> Marck wrote:
MDP>> The whole point of BCC is that messages addressed with it arrive from
MDP>> POP servers without it, so it won't be present to be filtered upon,
MDP>> not even in the kludges.
Douglas> I see your point. This is true even when one's bcc is to one's self.
Douglas> (Somehow it feels like that should be different, but how could it?
Douglas> Life is full of surprises).
Douglas> I should have explained from the beginning that the idea was to:
Douglas> 1).- have a copy of some what I send come back to me. It was my own
Douglas> email address that I wanted to appear in the bcc location of
Douglas> correspondence written from certain accounts and have it come back to
Douglas> the same or another account. Then,
Douglas> 2).- I wanted to filter those messages into into a given folder of one
Douglas> or more accounts. (You can filter each inbox and each folder, for that
Douglas> matter, right)? Perhaps I should just filter all messages from (not
Douglas> to) myself to a given folder, whether they originated as a bcc or not
Douglas> -since that's all I can do.
MDP>> The closest you can get is to give an additional rule that the
MDP>> recipient is NOT the BCC name, i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] .... Recipient ...
MDP>> Presence *No*.
You could put a special marker symbol in the sybject, like
## pingpong and filter incoming on ## or whatever you select to goto
your copy bin.
Douglas> But if the message came back with the bcc, how could the filter know
Douglas> what the bcc name had been? OK, it might if the bcc was in one more
Douglas> templates of the same folder. Do the rules know what the templates
Douglas> say? Is that what you're saying?
Douglas> Douglas Hinds
Douglas> Friday, November 05, 1999, 2:04:23 PM, you wrote:
MDP>> On 05 November 1999 at 16:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
DH>>> Having been able to insert automatically an email address as a bcc
DH>>> (but first had to note that using "quotes" is necessary), now I
DH>>> would like to filter mail arriving with a given bcc insertion to a
DH>>> given mail directory.
DH>>> However, there is no specific bcc listing given among the location
DH>>> options and using "kludges" for the location would be too nonspecific.
DH>>> Therefore, I assume that this can not be done in version 1.36. Am I
DH>>> correct?
MDP>> The whole point of BCC is that messages addressed with it arrive from
MDP>> POP servers without it, so it won't be present to be filtered upon,
MDP>> not even in the kludges.
MDP>> The closest you can get is to give an additional rule that the
MDP>> recipient is NOT the BCC name, i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] .... Recipient ...
MDP>> Presence *No*.
MDP>> Cheers,
MDP>> Marck
Douglas> Best regards,
Douglas> Douglas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.36
mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NOTE: 1 MAILRUN PER DAY ONLY
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
