Hi there!
On 11 Jan 00, at 22:15, Claudius Regn wrote
about "Re[2]: Interview with RITLabs! Fina":
> SL> TB! is good in some areas (database management) than other clients and
> SL> worse in other areas (IMAP).
>
> I'd rather have spell checking than IMAP. I'd rather have html-viewing
> than IMAP.
That's only you, please speak for *yourself* only;-) I definitely support Steve
*as much as I only can* on the point he made. *As much* of RFCs as it is
only possible *must* be supported. This is actually what makes me stay with
Pegasus right now.... Pegasus supports *lots* of RFC functionality TB doesn't,
and *I* use it extensively. The fact that *you* don't doesn't make any change
IMO. This is actually why I've argued with Steve on the Virtual Folders
suggestion;-) Advanced functionality *should* be supported, as much as
possible! This is the major point for me, personally. Of course, provided that it
doesn't bloat the code heavily and doesn't contradict with how the program
already performs. Neither of these is the case with IMAP4.
Therefore I wish to solidarize with those who are *against* adding HTML
editing, news-reading, virus-checking and web-browsing capabilities. I think
these are *bad ideas*. IMHO, of course;-)
--
SY, Alex
(St.Petersburg, Russia)
http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev
---
Thought for the day:
Double your drive space! Delete Windows!
---
PGP public keys on keyservers:
0xA2194BF9 (RSA); 0x214135A2 (DH/DSS)
fingerprints:
F222 4AEF EC9F 5FA6 7515 910A 2429 9CB1 (RSA)
A677 81C9 48CF 16D1 B589 9D33 E7D5 675F 2141 35A2 (DH/DSS)
---
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
