ML> being able to mark a word bold is more important (and they think
ML> using _these words are bold_ is an awkward alternative).

Come on now, the underscore means "underline" and you use asterisks to
indicate bold.  :)

Actually, I was stunned the first time Word did that formatting for
me.  I was so used to writing email-style, that I did _something new_
and actually got it underlined.

ML> A sad but true fact is, I rarely bother to indent or use caret marks
ML> (to highlight) anymore (unless I'm sure the recipients use mono
ML> fonts as well, such as people in this group), because I don't know
ML> whether it would be presented as I intended in the recipient's email
ML> client.

What kills me is when people do the caret underlining with
proportional fonts on.  Just ridiculous.

ML> Given the ubiquitous usage of proportional fonts in email clients, I
ML> even think the claim that TB format messages perfectly is a little
ML> bit, dare I say, self-serving.

I agree, although with the caveat that it does what *I* want, so it
does the right thing.  :)

-tom!

-- 
Hopin' this said *something* useful, [EMAIL PROTECTED] out.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to