On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 08:27:21PM -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote:
> Yeah, sure, right after you learn how to spell.
Oh, are we down to that level now? Sheesh, what a newbie.
> Most people who play golf well also usually spell well.
Most people who play golf can't spell at all and, instead, use spell
checkers and their secretaries to do it for them.
> I take exception to your mumbo jumbo ramblings above.
Only because it is so true, isn't it.
> You finally got something right -- we really have nothing to discuss.
Only because you're incapable of visualizing anything other than your
petty little world.
> So lets not discuss anything anymore, okay?
Yes, leave.
> I know how to hold a club, and that's all I need to know.
Yup, the wrong way. And you still cry when everything goes wrong and
blame everyone else instead of look at yourself.
> Can I swing at anything I want?
Sure, swing it at anything near you right now. Might I suggest the
computer. You'll get more use out of it that way.
> If you treated people decently, we wouldn't now be having at it.
If people used their brains instead of whining like a gerbil with no food
maybe I would treat them as something other than the rodents they are.
> Fascists like you only know one truth, your own.
Whoa, Fascist so soon? Come now, I expected better of you. So far you're
following the basic script. Digs on spelling, calls of fascism, what next,
comparing me to Hilter?
> It sure does, if you're trying to SELL SOFTWARE TO THE MAJORITY!
Newsflash, the majority will never buy TB!.
> Besides, the chances of you ever calling me a sissy-faggity boy to my
> face are:
> 1.Slim
> 2.Nil
> 3.Nonexistent
Only because
1: We'll never meet.
2: Because you're a social outcast.
3: That would run at the first chance.
Don't bet on what I won't do. I say it to your face, with a smile.
> So what? Again, I couldn't care any less about your problems, or your
> lack of any problems, either.
> Maybe you're just too damn dumb to know that you have a problem?
Nah, I can identify problems and most times offer reasonable solutions.
That, of course, requires critical thinking, problem solving and a lot of
intuition. Thins you lack completely.
> Geeeeeeeeez, I knew this group was an international one...but we must live
> on different freakin' planets!
Oh, you forgot to mention you're typing with your nose and left ear since
you were born with no limbs. Wow, my very first exchange with the mutt-man of
Mars!
> Wanna learn something?
> Try learning how to talk to people.
Why? I can do that just fine.
> Yeah, right...and screwball fascists like you get to determine what's
> "right," eh?
Nope. Idiot "majority rules" lemmings like you do, which is 9/10ths of
the problem in most nations.
> Which *still* makes you an %$#*&#, any way you cut it.
That is supposed to impress me? Hell, I admit I'm a curmudgeon and an
...hole. Ask anyone on here for more than 2 weeks.
> Too bad your follow-thru is so weak then, because you're not only
> wrong about this, you're an %$#*&# to boot.
Prove that I am wrong. So far your method takes more effort to do basic
things, mangles more text and causes more problems.
> Maybe the "problem" was with the *technology*?
Nope. The problem is with the people trying to break standards that are
there to enable them to communicate and then wonder why they can't when they
do.
> It's up to the industry to provide what the consumer wants.
> Not the other way around.
It is also up to the industry to not break standards. If they do then the
whole system breaks down and the customer gets nothing. Witness the whole
IE/Netscape war of competing /EXTENSIONS/ and ignorance of standards. End
result were a ton of pages which look like crap on 1/2 browsers.
Cardinal rule of the internet, bucko, don't break standards.
> Yeah, you may think you "limited" them, but all you probably did was just
> push them to another provider, i.e., one that did allow large attachments.
Really? They get to that provider and fiund out that most bounce messages
that are too large anyway.
> Maybe you should learn more about business and less about computers?
Maybe you should learn more about both. You don't ruin the basis of your
business in the name of the customer.
> How many people? Two? Three? *snerk* *snerk*
You're off by a few factors.
> Then the "problem," if you will, was with your specs. Not with your
> customer's desires or needs.
Those specs were designed before we started business. We were just doing
the responsible thing which is adhering to them.
> But you do sound like the typical ISP guy.
> They're mostly a bunch of %$#*&#s, too.
Why? Because we won't do everything every customer wants and in doing so
break all conectivity and security causing a complete outage of service? You
know, most people are quire glad that we don't bow down to every petty wish
and do that. They actually like being able to communicate from point A to
point B.
> And the reason that new standards will be put in place is because the
> people will DEMAND that they be put in place.
> You know, those stupid, ignorant "majority" folks.
Only when they have gone through the appropriate process to create a new
standard which includes peer review by the people who actually know what is
going on instead of the rats (that's people like you), who whine about things
not working without ever wondering why it doesn't work. And then it is a
/NEW/ standard, not the old one which was broken. I have no problems with a
/NEW/ standard being put in place to allow large transfers. However, it has
to beat out several existing technologies designed for such a task and simple
ways to access them.
> That should be your freakin' motto until you can talk to people decently.
No, my motto is "The ingenuity of human stupidity will never cease to
amaze me." People like you made me create that one and in the 10 years since
I've coined it it has been true nearly every day since.
>> >> Henry Ford-like, I suppose you would rather have said, "My way or the
> >> highway," eh?
> SL> "They can have any color they want as long as it is black." --
> Henry Ford
> Yeah, right, until Chevy came out with blue, green, white, and a maaaavelous
> shade of yellow!
No, until a better drying process came along. But then, I didn't expect
an ignorant twit such as yourself to know anything about history beyond the
revisiting of dinner.
> SL> Hey, you never know, I might just be.
> No chance. You're too damn dumb to get anywhere.
*chuckle* As compare to whom, you? The gerbil of the world. "It doesn't
work, WAHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH".
Nah. Trust me, I'm on a better track than you are.
> And, no, I won't be listening to you, so do us both a favor and save your
> breath.
Do the list a favor, get your ignorant face away from here.
> And a foul-smelling breath it is.
Woooo.... Pardon me if I don't shudder.
> When I want to become a petty, churlish, mean-spirited little fascist, I
> promise to come to you for guidance.
Nah, you don't have the intelligence to even do simple things with a text
editor. The best you can aspire to is being the first ever Darwin Award
based on an actual death. I'd metting something that involves beastiality and
motorsports in some new, inbred configuration. You'll be a pioneer for your
kin.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
