Hi there, Nick, Monday, May 6, 2002, 9:45:10 AM, you wrote:
NA> Hello Dierk, NA> On Monday, May 06 2002 at 12:00 AM PDT, you wrote: >> 1. Nick, let's not get into another (tedious) technical debate about >> Logics. NA> No, I don't want to start another tedious debate... only trying to make a NA> point on behalf of all the new Users that have recently come on board. To NA> them, surely this numbering system and lack of definition on the part of NA> RITLabs is confusing to them... it certainly is to me. >> 2. For all practical purposes everybody can interpret the small fixes >> as he wants. I don't consider them betas. If you want to, it's >> perfectly alright. NA> But therein lies the problem: No one 'knows' exactly 'what' the fixes are! NA> There is no ReadMe File included... Users are at a loss to explain the NA> appearance of a new version on the Beta Site. Should we or shouldn't we NA> download it? NA> I suppose the problem is that it is left to each individual User to NA> interpret for themselves what is a valid release and what isn't. IMHO that NA> responsibility lies with RITLabs and this whole discussion would be mute NA> if they would simply follow any number of good recommendations from NA> numerous List Members... such as adding a simple ReadMe File to each and NA> every download they put up. NA> Don't you find that the least bit frustrating? I sure do... and I can't NA> imagine how a new User feels when trying to make sense out of all this. You got it right Nick!! Too many changes without published reasons. We have to hunt for tips on "tbudl". And that's reason for 200 messages per day on this List. I guess this is good business for someone. Bummer!! -- Cheers, Julius ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
