Hi Jonathan, Monday, February 17, 2003, 2:50:36 PM, you wrote:
> Well worth the money in my opinion ;) I tend to agree with you there. > It could be that the second list doesn't use a reply-to header. When > that line is missing in the headers, hitting reply goes back to the > sender. It could also be possible that Becky is seeing list headers, > and automatically replying to the list without option. TheBat doesn't > do that, and follows what it is told to do. There are options to work > around that, such as templates that will alter the addresses (I'm sure > others will give better examples than I ever could). Another option is > to hit the "Reply to all" button instead of just reply, and move the > addresses around. That was exactly it. The other list indeed does not use a Reply-To header. > TheBat seems to only respond to certain list headers. Certain list > software puts, in the headers of each mail, details about the list, > and special options, such as unsubscribe, help and such. I don't think > TheBat has a handle on all the list software available, or even close > to it. The other list is a LISTSERV list. I know they're a pretty common mailing list outfit, so I was surprised to find out that this particular one doesn't use the list's address in their Reply-To's. Maybe I should suggest to them that they do that, and make it easier on the rest of us. :) Thanks for your help! -- Best regards, Kim ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
