-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, February 17, 2003, Kim wrote...
>> It could be that the second list doesn't use a reply-to header. > That was exactly it. The other list indeed does not use a Reply-To > header. >> TheBat seems to only respond to certain list headers. Certain list >> software puts, in the headers of each mail, details about the list, >> and special options, such as unsubscribe, help and such. I don't >> think TheBat has a handle on all the list software available, or >> even close to it. > The other list is a LISTSERV list. I know they're a pretty common > mailing list outfit, so I was surprised to find out that this > particular one doesn't use the list's address in their Reply-To's. > Maybe I should suggest to them that they do that, and make it easier > on the rest of us. :) It might be that the list administrators/moderators have decided that the don't want the reply-to being set. Most list management software allows for changes of that field to make the list work in ways they want. It might be worth posting on the wishlist to see if you can get LISTSERV's headers added to the specials - mailing list feature. Off the top of my head I cannot remember the address for it, I'm sure it is mentioned in the list information (see the URL at the bottom of this email). To be even more helpful, you could include a sample of the headers from LISTSERV for the RitLab developers to they know what they're looking for. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPlFcmCuD6BT4/R9zEQKRVQCgiJJ8AN3zQ33h3W2lFjX+N9g/xjwAnRXK S5H868d2l3lkm4LMTSfUUQxJ =2Zr3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
