Douglas Hinds, [DH] wrote: AM>> From there new matches are dynamically added as the real folders are AM>> watched.
> Andre mentioned using it for the messages he wants to reply to. I do the same. I created a colour group for replies. I then created a VF which will list all messages unreplied to and which have the 'for reply' colour group. So when I wish to mark a message for reply later on, I assign it the reply colour group. Since it's unreplied to it appears in the VF. When I reply to the message, it loses it's unreplied to status and therefore disappears from the VF. >>> So maybe I should wait a bit. AM>> :) Why??? > Because 1).- RitLabs is getting close to another full release (Mary > said); Since the v1 to v2 step, Ritlabs has always been close to full releases. The next will be out shortly. :) > and 2).- She also mentioned an irritating bug that might not be > present in the coming version. One irritating bug tends to replace another. The question is how much do these bugs mean to you. What I'm trying to say is that there's no sense waiting. There are many using the current incarnation of v2 for serious work and without significant problems. The only reason I'd suggest waiting for the next full release before trying v2 would be for IMAP. It has undergone a lot of improvements since its debut in v2's initial offerings. AM>> Which all support HTML creation with the exception of probably Becky. AM>> Stability is a very personal experience. > We all operate under different conditions, with different hardware, > different software and internet accesses. Exactly. So the only way to know if TB! v2 will be stable for you is to actually try it. Features are another thing, but again there's only so much one can get out of a description of them. > Both of my computers run WinXP (one Pro, one Home). Fabulous. Since when? :) > The first OS I used was OS/2 v 2.1, a better windows than windows, a > better dos than dos, now used only by banks. I lasted a couple months with Win95 and moved to OS/2 Warp. I agree wholeheartedly. OS/2 v2.1 was FAR better than Windows 3.1 and Warp 3&4 better than Win9x/ME and also NT4 in some respects. However, OS/2 stagnated while the others progressed. It's now a relic. :) > The kind of mail you get allows you to systematize / automatize your > mail to a greater extent. Also, your work may emphasize or require > repetitive ways of doing certain tasks, where I need to innovate. I don't think it's the different type of mail but the difference in how we work and choose to approach mail management. -- -=[ Allie Martin ]=- List Moderator and fellow end-user PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
pgp858aBjdHB5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
