Hello Allie, Saturday, September 4, 2004, 10:36:30 PM, you wrote:
> Tony, [T] wrote: <.....> >>>> And even if RitLabs hired 100 graphics artists TB! will never be >>>> main stream. It's targeted at a different market than Outlook. A >>>> market with people that are prepared to invest more time in an >>>> application. And I could be very wrong here but I think that kind of >>>> people are the ones that complain the most about bloatware. >>> Yes. You could be wrong, and I do believe you're wrong on this >>> unfounded assumption. >> On what statement? > The entire paragraph which seems to outline Ritlab's intended market > segment. >> No I have no written proof about that statement. But you haven't >> either. > This is why I usually make no claims in that regard. You made the > claim, so the burden of proof is on you. The #1 perfectly rational > reason for one not understanding why Ritlabs would waste time on > feature X is that one isn't aware of the needs of the userbase Ritlabs > currently serves or targets. Of course, close behind that #1 would be > the more popular #2 which is that Ritlabs don't know what they're > doing. Nice try.... If you really see no difference between Outlook and TB! and their market segment there is no much use continuing this chat. But I believe you do. And targeting another market segment means TB! would change so much it's no longer TB! <.....> Finally. It's fine with me to discuss this in greater detail. But I can't seem to get my point across. I fear that's largely due to my poor English. It may look like running away but it is not :-) But <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> shows my original intention of my posting. Especially the last paragraph. Until next time Allie :-) -- Tony Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny? ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
