> Hello MFPA,

> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:48:00 +0000 GMT (09/01/2009, 07:48 +0700 GMT),
> MFPA wrote:

>>> I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread.

M>> It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up
M>> the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new message
M>> didn't change.

> I'm with Rick here, I never saw what you are now missing. Had they
> implemented it, I would have protested: Only unread messages should be
> shown as unread, not the messages above it. Because I have read them
> already. They are not unread, so they shouldn't be shown as unread
> only because a new message is added at the bottom.

> So, all is fine.

Are we perhaps talking about in a collapsed tree branch? If so then I
never noticed. It would have to highlight to let you know there was an
unread message in the branch (?) 

Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today. - James Dean

v4.1.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3


Current version is 4.1.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Reply via email to