> Hello MFPA, > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:48:00 +0000 GMT (09/01/2009, 07:48 +0700 GMT), > MFPA wrote:
>>> I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread. M>> It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up M>> the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new message M>> didn't change. > I'm with Rick here, I never saw what you are now missing. Had they > implemented it, I would have protested: Only unread messages should be > shown as unread, not the messages above it. Because I have read them > already. They are not unread, so they shouldn't be shown as unread > only because a new message is added at the bottom. > So, all is fine. Are we perhaps talking about in a collapsed tree branch? If so then I never noticed. It would have to highlight to let you know there was an unread message in the branch (?) -- Rick Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today. - James Dean v4.1.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.1.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
