On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 04:39:19PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem > superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more > developer interest and active development. > > Are there any users still using ccd(4) and/or raid(4) and unable to > upgrade to softraid(4)? Will anyone be up a creek if ccd(4)/raid(4) > were removed? >
I use neither but know people claim to be using one or the other, but mostly raid(4), a.k.a. raidframe. In particular until softraid can reliably be booted from, I think raid(4) will be useful to have. .... Ken
