On 06/24/11 19:40, Alexander Polakov wrote: > * Christopher Zimmermann <madro...@zakweb.de> [110624 21:24]: >> On 06/24/11 18:46, Joel Sing wrote: >>> On Friday 24 June 2011, Benny Lofgren wrote: >>>> - More consistent sd<n> unit allocation (perhaps this is achievable >>>> with DUID, I haven't had time to explore that yet) >>> >>> sd(4) unit allocation will always be inconsistent and unpredicatable >>> - DUIDs will let you avoid this entirely. >> >> >> By the way, is there a way to mount umass(4) devices without looking at >> dmesg for the number of the sd<n> device? >> > > hotplugd(8)
That's not what I thought about, but even better - hotplugd the BSD way. Just great :) Thanks!
