On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 07:44:52PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Kenneth R Westerback > <kwesterb...@rogers.com> wrote: > > I use neither but know people claim to be using one or the other, > > but mostly raid(4), a.k.a. raidframe. > > Then it sounds like the solution is to subtly break them so we can > smoke out these claimed users! ;) > > > In particular until softraid > > can reliably be booted from, I think raid(4) will be useful to have. > > I don't think you can boot from raid(4) either though?
I may be confusing 'boot from' and 'provide root'. Again, never tried it myself that I can recall. The important point being that whatever it can do, softraid must do better. :-) .... Ken
