On 06/24/11 18:46, Joel Sing wrote: > On Friday 24 June 2011, Benny Lofgren wrote: >> - More consistent sd<n> unit allocation (perhaps this is achievable >> with DUID, I haven't had time to explore that yet) > > sd(4) unit allocation will always be inconsistent and unpredicatable > - DUIDs will let you avoid this entirely.
By the way, is there a way to mount umass(4) devices without looking at dmesg for the number of the sd<n> device?
