* Christopher Zimmermann <madro...@zakweb.de> [110624 21:24]: > On 06/24/11 18:46, Joel Sing wrote: > > On Friday 24 June 2011, Benny Lofgren wrote: > >> - More consistent sd<n> unit allocation (perhaps this is achievable > >> with DUID, I haven't had time to explore that yet) > > > > sd(4) unit allocation will always be inconsistent and unpredicatable > > - DUIDs will let you avoid this entirely. > > > By the way, is there a way to mount umass(4) devices without looking at > dmesg for the number of the sd<n> device? >
hotplugd(8) -- Alexander Polakov | plhk.ru
