[+misc@, for users not subscribed to tech@]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Matthew Dempsky <matt...@dempsky.org> wrote:
> What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)?  They both seem
> superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more
> developer interest and active development.
>
> Are there any users still using ccd(4) and/or raid(4) and unable to
> upgrade to softraid(4)?  Will anyone be up a creek if ccd(4)/raid(4)
> were removed?

Reply via email to