Often we have had to swing the UE just a little to bring down the higher of the 2 CINRs, which in my mind is crazy that we lose some signal.
>From the few we have fixed so far we have found that its placement of the UE and that by getting it up off the roof a few more feet, or relocating it on the roof can make a difference. A few UE's are 4db CINR apart and nothing I do will fix it. Matt Carpenter On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Henry N. Chappell II <[email protected] > wrote: > Matthew, > > What have you done or found that helps bring CINR 0 & 1 within 2db of each > other? > > Thanks-- > ETEX > Henry II > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Matthew Carpenter <[email protected]> > Date: 8/6/16 9:16 AM (GMT-06:00) > To: [email protected], [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Telrad] Wimax to LTE > > First thing I see is that your CINR 0 and 1 are more then 2 db apart. > This seems to cause issues. > So much so that I have a graph that's shows me any UE with 2 or more db > difference in CINR. > > > > Matthew Carpenter > Amarillo Wireless > 806-316-5071 > > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:22 AM -0500, "Ian Fraser" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> IMHO The point was - "look 186 customers at $50 per month on ONE sector = >> 9.3 K in revenue per month from ONE sector on one tower".... and one of the >> teaser emails had numbers something similar to that.... some folks may have >> bought into that I guess... blindly without doing the math ? Maybe, I >> suppose. >> >> I wanted a 3.65 product that worked and had some decent power behind it. >> Power seems to be there but these disconnecting UE's are a Pain in the >> ass. Here's one of them. This is 8.3Km. Perfect LOS; clear on F3 from end >> to end. It is the only UE on this sector. Dead center of the beam, and it >> disconnects randomly. Why? >> Connection Time : *3* Hours *46* Minutes *25* Seconds >> >> LTE Information >> State: *Attached* >> >> DL Frequency: *3655000* kHz UL Frequency: *3655000* kHz >> Bandwidth: *10000* kHz RSRP0: *-95* dBm >> RSRP1: *-94* dBm RSRQ: *-8* dB >> CINR0: *23* dB CINR1: *26* dB >> SINR0: *23* dB SINR1: *26* dB >> TX Power: *1* dBm PCI: *373* >> Cell ID: *95490* >> >> >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> On 04/08/2016 11:04 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: >> >> I know the company that the original Holly Grail email was showing - >> they pretty much encompass me and their reputation for being stupidly, >> ridiculously, atrociously over subbed, and installing ANYONE regardless >> of the signal, is the best thing that ever happened to my company... so >> you're not going to serve 186 UE's at 10 to 25Mbps each like the Power >> Point slides show... the math isn't there. >> >> I remember those slides.....I kept my mouth shut while they did their >> presentation, but I commented to my colleagues afterwards about the fact >> that their graph showed the BS at 100% airtime utilization for 16 hours >> a day. I don't remember what they were trying to demonstrate with those >> charts though. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Telrad mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >> >> >> -- *Matthew Carpenter* *806-316-5071 office* *806-236-9558 cell*
_______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
