On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > That's the question though - is it required? I thought the test case would > be marked as optional. We already require FMW in "Default boot and install" > matrix, so Fedora is covered (we just don't know *what* Fedora they used > for that). And are any FMW crashes on Win/macOS blocking? I don't think we > have a criterion for that (the question is whether we should). > > So as long as we keep that table optional, I think it's useful to split > out the Fedora version, so that we clearly see what people tried and what > they didn't. Also, for the same reason it would probably help to see > Windows 7 and Windows 10 separated. > > But if we want to mark it as required, I wouldn't want yet another > exploded matrix, and I agree Fedora 26 could be left out (and Windows > merged together). > I figured it wouldn't hurt if I add the table marked as optional: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AInstallation_test_matrix&diff=491515&oldid=491270 We can now continue discussing how we want it to look like, but at least it's there already. As a footnote, I hardcoded Fedora 24/25/26 numbers, because I wasn't sure how to do that better. I can use a template, but I don't want the numbers to change once it is converted to a standard install matrix, and I'm not sure what method relval uses to do so. (So this is mainly a question for Adam, whether we can use templates in there or not).
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
