Your example is interesting!
I succeeded to correct it, but with a MusiXTeX trick:
8<-----
2 1
3 4
3 4
0 1
0 2
20 0
bt
./
ApebI 10
B
%
% Bar 20
%
a83 f ds1 b d f [l+0+7 b ]j rbd8 | /
rb2 rb1 [uj ds14 f a ] | //
[ f15 e ds cs ] b2 t | /
%
% Bars 20-21
%
r2b g8d d1 //
r4b r8bd [lj \raise-3\internote\hbox{\tbbu2}\ f1 ] r1b [lj d1s e ] r1b /
g8d f1 [+0-2 g8d ]j r1b rb4 //
b14 t ds e8 t e1 t ds- e8 t [ e1 t ]j rb8d /
8<-----
So I have a question too. In the second bar, the first note of the left hand is coded
with the MusixTeX trick. I don't understand why [m2lj f1 ] doesn't work. Does it mean
that the multiplicity can not be forced for staff-jumping beams?
Olivier
_______________________________________________
Tex-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
