Olivier wrote
>
> I succeeded to correct it, but with a MusiXTeX trick:
>
> 8<-----
> 2 1
> 3 4
> 3 4
> 0 1
> 0 2
> 20 0
>
> bt
> ./
> ApebI 10
> B
> %
> % Bar 20
> %
> a83 f ds1 b d f [l+0+7 b ]j rbd8 | /
> rb2 rb1 [uj ds14 f a ] | //
This is exactly the method I would use to fix the first staff-jumping beam,
and it is mentioned in the PMX manual. But in this case it only works
properly after altering the later staff-jumping beams!
> [ f15 e ds cs ] b2 t | /
> %
> % Bars 20-21
> %
> r2b g8d d1 //
> r4b r8bd [lj \raise-3\internote\hbox{\tbbu2}\ f1 ] r1b [lj d1s e ] r1b /
> g8d f1 [+0-2 g8d ]j r1b rb4 //
> b14 t ds e8 t e1 t ds- e8 t [ e1 t ]j rb8d /
> 8<-----
>
> So I have a question too. In the second bar, the first note of
> the left hand is coded with the MusixTeX trick. I don't
> understand why [m2lj f1 ] doesn't work. Does it mean that the
> multiplicity can not be forced for staff-jumping beams?
I've looked at the issue of changing multiplicity of staff-jumping beams in
the past, and thrown up my hands in frustration. I'll have another look this
weekend; maybe I can teach PMX to use Olivier's trick with \raise.
--Don Simons
_______________________________________________
Tex-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
