Hi Dickton I am working on two quesionaires, the most complete and most simple is on the web [1] Its work in development.
The second is more 'in development but more complex. The order of the questions depends on previous answers. I am working with a proper IT professional using an method which focuses on user involovement. I can show you this one as well in due course, but there is some bugs in the system at the moment. Best Wishes Alex [1] http://r.a.hough.googlepages.com/TFI.html ps. coincidentally I am working in mental health. another of my TW projects is on a NHS creativity in mental health project. http://r.a.hough.googlepages.com/TFI.html 2009/4/16 dickon <[email protected]>: > > Thankyou Mark. My HTML is definitely not up to this job, but at least > I have some pointers of where to head. Entirely see your point about > being both Nervous and Not nervous - both from an existential and a > programming perspective! > > Best, > > Dickon > > On 16 Apr, 17:54, "Mark S." <[email protected]> wrote: >> Following some help from Eric Shulman, I wrote myself a routine that >> collects information from an HTML form, runs it through a format >> string, and places it somewhere inside of an existing tiddler. >> >> This kind of routine could probably be modified to create a brand new >> tiddler with questionnaire results. I haven't posted it anywhere >> (except once somewhere in this forum) but I could again if there is >> interest. >> >> You would have to rewrite your quiz as a real HTML form, though. You >> use checkboxes throughout, but radio buttons would be more >> appropriate. As it is, someone could be simultaneously Nervous and >> Certainly Not Nervous. You know, I've had days like that. >> >> In order to be useful for later processing, you would want to think >> about how the results are organized. I'm guessing that putting each >> answer into a slice would be most appropriate >> >> q1: 1 <answer is 1 to 3> >> q2: 3 >> ... >> >> In any event, the final results need to be in some format that TW can >> easily grab. There are also sections, data fields and the <data> >> plugin, but to me this seems most easy to edit any mistakes. >> >> And of course, each questionnaire would be tagged as "SDQResults" (or >> something). >> >> Then you could write, or have written a routine in a tiddler that >> would process each tiddler, and apply whatever process you want >> (sorry, I didn't look at your PDF). >> >> Just some thoughts, >> >> -- Mark >> >> On Apr 15, 4:11 pm, dickon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi. following on from my intro about the TiddlyManual project the >> > other day (novel manualization of psychiatry/psychotherapy >> > interventions), I have two more specific and technical questions. >> >> > First, I'd like to be able to make forms out of a tiddler so that the >> > user can type information straight in without having to switch to the >> > edit mode (whcih would scare the most technophobic therapists!) - I am >> > sure this can be done, but I can't work it out - sorry. >> >> > Then, I'd like to be able to sort out a simple algorithm to "score" a >> > particular questionnaire called the SDQ (Strengths and difficulties >> > Questionnaire -http://www.sdqinfo.com/questionnaires/english/c3.pdf). >> > This is a very simple and mercifully short questionnaire that is >> > surprisingly valid at highlighting clinical vulnerability in children, >> > and has been tried out on zillions of children worldwide; it also >> > seems to pick up clinically-useful CHANGE over time (helping us >> > measure whether we are doing any good or not). >> >> > The Q's are divided into a number of sub-sets that address specific >> > symptom areas (Emotional symptoms, Conduct problems, Hyperactivity, >> > Peer problems, and Pro-social features) and each Question is scored >> > Not, Somewhat or Certainly true... so it is a question of assigning >> > certain scores to certain tick-boxes (see the scoring system >> > here:http://www.sdqinfo.com/ScoreSheets/e2.pdf) , and also assigning >> > certain sets of tick-boxes to the different symptom areas. Ideally >> > I'd generate a score at the end that consists of sub-scores within >> > each of the symptom areas mentioned above. >> >> > I can make the boxes >> > (seehttp://burningchrome.com:8090/bags/IMP/tiddlers.wiki >> > and search SDQ to see where I've got to...), but getting into the >> > further details required to generate a score defeats me! >> >> > Best wishes, >> >> > Dickon Bevington > > > -- t: 0161 442 2202 m: 0781 372 50 17 skype: alexhough delicious: alexhough --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
