That is great, Alex. The Likert scale is exactly the kind of thing I would need to use. Your questionnaire is very thought-provoking too, and I like the way it generates instant feedback with traffic-light gradings!
Thanks, Dickon On Apr 17, 10:59 am, Alex Hough <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dickton > > I am working on two quesionaires, the most complete and most simple is > on the web [1] > Its work in development. > > The second is more 'in development but more complex. The order of the > questions depends on previous answers. I am working with a proper IT > professional using an method which focuses on user involovement. I can > show you this one as well in due course, but there is some bugs in the > system at the moment. > > Best Wishes > Alex > [1]http://r.a.hough.googlepages.com/TFI.html > ps. coincidentally I am working in mental health. another of my TW > projects is on a NHS creativity in mental health project. > > http://r.a.hough.googlepages.com/TFI.html > > 2009/4/16 dickon <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > Thankyou Mark. My HTML is definitely not up to this job, but at least > > I have some pointers of where to head. Entirely see your point about > > being both Nervous and Not nervous - both from an existential and a > > programming perspective! > > > Best, > > > Dickon > > > On 16 Apr, 17:54, "Mark S." <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Following some help from Eric Shulman, I wrote myself a routine that > >> collects information from an HTML form, runs it through a format > >> string, and places it somewhere inside of an existing tiddler. > > >> This kind of routine could probably be modified to create a brand new > >> tiddler with questionnaire results. I haven't posted it anywhere > >> (except once somewhere in this forum) but I could again if there is > >> interest. > > >> You would have to rewrite your quiz as a real HTML form, though. You > >> use checkboxes throughout, but radio buttons would be more > >> appropriate. As it is, someone could be simultaneously Nervous and > >> Certainly Not Nervous. You know, I've had days like that. > > >> In order to be useful for later processing, you would want to think > >> about how the results are organized. I'm guessing that putting each > >> answer into a slice would be most appropriate > > >> q1: 1 <answer is 1 to 3> > >> q2: 3 > >> ... > > >> In any event, the final results need to be in some format that TW can > >> easily grab. There are also sections, data fields and the <data> > >> plugin, but to me this seems most easy to edit any mistakes. > > >> And of course, each questionnaire would be tagged as "SDQResults" (or > >> something). > > >> Then you could write, or have written a routine in a tiddler that > >> would process each tiddler, and apply whatever process you want > >> (sorry, I didn't look at your PDF). > > >> Just some thoughts, > > >> -- Mark > > >> On Apr 15, 4:11 pm, dickon <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Hi. following on from my intro about the TiddlyManual project the > >> > other day (novel manualization of psychiatry/psychotherapy > >> > interventions), I have two more specific and technical questions. > > >> > First, I'd like to be able to make forms out of a tiddler so that the > >> > user can type information straight in without having to switch to the > >> > edit mode (whcih would scare the most technophobic therapists!) - I am > >> > sure this can be done, but I can't work it out - sorry. > > >> > Then, I'd like to be able to sort out a simple algorithm to "score" a > >> > particular questionnaire called the SDQ (Strengths and difficulties > >> > Questionnaire -http://www.sdqinfo.com/questionnaires/english/c3.pdf). > >> > This is a very simple and mercifully short questionnaire that is > >> > surprisingly valid at highlighting clinical vulnerability in children, > >> > and has been tried out on zillions of children worldwide; it also > >> > seems to pick up clinically-useful CHANGE over time (helping us > >> > measure whether we are doing any good or not). > > >> > The Q's are divided into a number of sub-sets that address specific > >> > symptom areas (Emotional symptoms, Conduct problems, Hyperactivity, > >> > Peer problems, and Pro-social features) and each Question is scored > >> > Not, Somewhat or Certainly true... so it is a question of assigning > >> > certain scores to certain tick-boxes (see the scoring system > >> > here:http://www.sdqinfo.com/ScoreSheets/e2.pdf) , and also assigning > >> > certain sets of tick-boxes to the different symptom areas. Ideally > >> > I'd generate a score at the end that consists of sub-scores within > >> > each of the symptom areas mentioned above. > > >> > I can make the boxes > >> > (seehttp://burningchrome.com:8090/bags/IMP/tiddlers.wiki > >> > and search SDQ to see where I've got to...), but getting into the > >> > further details required to generate a score defeats me! > > >> > Best wishes, > > >> > Dickon Bevington > > -- > t: 0161 442 2202 > m: 0781 372 50 17 > skype: alexhough > delicious: alexhough --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
