Mark S. wrote:
>
> The problem is that random people were closing out things simply because 
> they weren't interested in them. Probably they didn't realize that their 
> actions had global implications.
>

I also think that on "closing" there is a simple "fat finger" issue. 
I have myself marked threads as closed by accident when they are still 
open. 
I think that is not uncommon.
 

> For me, this makes reading harder. I see "closed", and then have to check 
> again because I can't really trust the status.
>

Reluctantly agree.

My point was more where a thread author has asked for it explicitly to be 
closed.

TT 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6c122b7b-a87b-4bf5-b594-a9c97a3f5f6c%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to