Mark S. wrote: > > The problem is that random people were closing out things simply because > they weren't interested in them. Probably they didn't realize that their > actions had global implications. >
I also think that on "closing" there is a simple "fat finger" issue. I have myself marked threads as closed by accident when they are still open. I think that is not uncommon. > For me, this makes reading harder. I see "closed", and then have to check > again because I can't really trust the status. > Reluctantly agree. My point was more where a thread author has asked for it explicitly to be closed. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6c122b7b-a87b-4bf5-b594-a9c97a3f5f6c%40googlegroups.com.

