Whatever happens, as long as "TiddlyWiki" stays somehow part of the product
name, and "Tiddler" stays as the word for a "node" of information (I am
rather fond of the "Philosophy of Tiddlers"...), I can't see me having any
reason to grumble ...
I like TonyM's "TW Platform", if considered the "short name" for the
product.
A longer moniker, just to describe the product, might be nice. An idea for
the $hit$ and the giggle$:
- TW Information Componentization Platform?
- I rather like this as a long form to go along with TonyM's shorter
"TW Platform"
- TiddlyWiki Information Componentization Platform ?
On Monday, March 2, 2020 at 9:08:23 AM UTC-4, bimlas wrote:
>
> Continuation of the
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/MKVwkEmCimQ thread.
>
> In a nutshell: TiddlyWiki is gaining popularity because it appears in more
> articles and podcasts, but most of the time they smile at its name, so it
> doesn't seem to be taken seriously (although at the end of the test they
> usually praise the software itself). The name TiddlyWiki may hinder its
> distribution, so we should consider renaming it.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/595f77e4-66c3-4b44-a2c4-22cef6a0f396%40googlegroups.com.
