> Don't think the name is one the issue here?
Right. Likely several inter-related issues that might include ... 1 - *Naming:* "Tiddly" & "Tiddler" (I agree with Mark S. they are overall negative), also likely "Wiki" (I'm not convinced it is a Good fit to TW). 2 - *Unclarity: *the problem with comparing to things like "Shower" is you end up comparing a single utility with limited scope with a tool (TW) that let's you make something like Shower AND any number of other tools. I think the comparison base is misleading? But that reflects a difficulty in actually articulating what TW is. Should we pitch the APPS of TW made or pitch the PROCESS of making? Hope that is clear enough. 3 - *Poor Showcase: *at the moment we don't really have enough diverse fully developed apps listed in one place you can point a user (with specific outcomes to look at). FYI I'd say your work is very good for showing "range" or outcomes. If we listed another 70 or so TW with diverse purposes functioning and organised by purpose I think it would help a lot. 4 - *Making Apps. v. Using Them: *Question: *is the audience/user-cohort people who want to make apps?* Or (and) *those who just want to use it out-of-the-box in a specific field of interest?* (e.g. for: ethnographic notes; pin board; maintaining a legal document; searching the internet; gallery of images; recording observations in an experiment; shopping-lists etc, etc). Short question: *Whilst specific apps can be defined, what do you promote? The final apps or "the making tool"?* Thoughts TT On Sunday, 8 March 2020 07:42:46 UTC+1, Mohammad wrote: > > Mark, > have you noted on the stars Tiddlywiki > <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5> has got on GitHub? 4.6k > > A very small html app like Shower which creates slides on html5+js+css has > got 4.4k > If I compare Shower <https://github.com/shower/shower>with Tiddlywiki, I > give it 10 against 100? Shower can be implemented like a TW plugin. I > believe Tiddlyshow is much powerful and feature rich in comparison to > Shower! > > Popularity and ranks in GitHub encourage newcomers to think those with > higher stars are better product! > > Don't think the name is one the issue here? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4a762c27-22f9-47c9-8213-26c24bdd1ddc%40googlegroups.com.
