TT The two quotes from Texas ... >
South Texas? Much of that is rural and rural areas historically have been neglected not just public assistance-- most social programs are based in cities-- but health care in general. Appalachia and the First Nations reservations have much worst because of their isolation. And I assume lower middle class? There's a povery level cut off for a lot of puclic assistance that puts the lower middle class in a bind-- make enough that the government determined your don't need assistance but in reality you aren't making enough to cover things like medical and child care. Been there and have a permanently bowed bone in my hand cause I didn't want the extra expense of the county hospital to set it for me after I broke it. People on public assistance were getting better health care than me with a job-- in some cases better housing. > A person ill would have NO idea of Liberals wishes you may have. There is > as yet no Federal commitment to universal care. > Liberal? not here-- disavowed both-- there won't be a commitment-- people weren't happy with the hidden tax of the ACA-- America probably couldn't afford (can't handle what social programs it already has) nor the citizens would want to pay the taxes required for universal health care. Alot of Americans can't afford the taxes already in place-- we don't get paid enough for health care let alone financing it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2c110bd9-08aa-421e-b23a-2765909c9d24%40googlegroups.com.
