Mat Point 2 -- Its important to acknowledge Yakov.
-- "saving" seamlesslyTWC ... has proved to be an issue. Yakov embraced the importance to TWC continuity. -- the complexities on "saving" issue were likely NOT anticipated way back when TWC started that. -- it matters to have minimal ongoing support for at least that, so as not to break a "30 year rule" on longevity. TT On Saturday, 16 May 2020 12:54:01 UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > Disregarding the irony of the very title: > > In another thread someone requested more attention to TiddlyWiki > Classic/TWC/TW2, i.e the predecessor to TW5. To which I replied: > > I don't get why NEW attention should be brought to TWC which is, after >> all, a system we've advanced from. Sure, it works and it's great, but there >> has been no development for it in almost a decade. It seems mostly that >> people who use it do so because they didn't muster up the effort to make >> the transition. Yes, I know this is not 100% the case because TWC is more >> performant in some aspects but the same can probably be said of Windows 95 >> or whatever. We've moved on, for good reasons, and we should not "trick" >> people into spending time on that old technology. There is recurring >> confusion for newcomers where they found some plugin or information that >> strangely "doesn't work". >> Let TWC fade out to be a nostalgic memory that is still *beautiful *but >> that we shouldn't *dwell *on. > > > And to which TiddlyTweeter replied: > > Could you please take this OUT of [that thread] so I can lambast your ass >> appropriately. > > > AHA! Challenge accepted! > > > <https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/mt/2013/11/WS5/lead_large.jpg> > > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/09e51452-e9a5-44f8-a4af-07207c260f1a%40googlegroups.com.
