Yakov, As I said, I believe TWC should be maintained at a minimum and its great its getting more attenton.
> Do you mean that on TW5 you are not using plugins much? > I do yous particular ones quite a bit, however when there is no plugin for an idea I have its much easier for me to build my own solution with wikitext, Macros etc... without touching JS > >> - I was starting to find TWC more fragile and had a few disasters. >> >> I believe this is more or less in the past, but let me know if you have > new issues. > Thanks, but a recent return to TWC showed me how much I had unlearned. But I am glad you are there. I may be wrong, but some of the fragility related to its architecture, but perhaps my own knowledge has developed since. > >> - I now feel I can do almost anything in TW5 when TWC made me >> dependant on more than the Google Forums. >> >> Good for you, I guess (although it's not totally clear what you mean, may > be the same as above, no need for plugins). > With TWC I was much more dependant on plugins and other authors, now I can role my own a lot easier. The hackability and technology options are greater in TW5 unless there was a major revolution in TWC when I was not looking. There tends to be less interdependence, and clashes between plugins I have moved on, but respect the the continued use of TWC by those that do, I endevor every day to test and Question TW5 and promote improvements to expand is capabilities, adding a lot my self, much to be published by me sooner of later. I can only invest my obsession in one platform, the most open I know. Regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/479b8935-9af4-4d29-8c49-fa28fe750545%40googlegroups.com.
