Ciao bobj Very good case example (http://cultconv.com/ [footnote---on mobile its too minuscule!]).
BTW, I really took to your last point ... Throughout all of my research career, the issue that continually crops up > is context. I think this is the crucial component to keep things > understandable. Yet no agreed understanding of context exists yet we all > use it ... > Right. In terms of information design issues there is no algorithm for accurately deriving either "scope of meaning" or "scope of inference (context implying)". Though it is pretty clear on net that within "fields of interest" context is ALWAYS playing an implicit role in successful sites. I thought the site you gave access to excellent. *Very honed to purpose*. It is an unusual (uplifting) thing seeing such a "schematization" work so well. I think that is the point. You have to "sniff/tease" out context and back generate (derive) schema from that first-felt understanding that isn't otherwise derivable. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/30624665-2ceb-4ed6-837b-fa34b6c04ca6n%40googlegroups.com.
