TiddlyTweeter wrote: "Very good case example (http://cultconv.com/ [footnote---on mobile its too minuscule!])."
yes, I know of the sizing issue on mobile devices. Not sure how to handle that other than a redesign which I am loathe to do given usage stats (~8,000 per month over last calendar year). The basic design is for multiple synchronous channels of information, in this case four (video/audio, transcript, table of contents and images with captions). Altogether too much for a small screen. Plus on iPhone, the video takes over the whole screen anyway. bobj On Tuesday, 1 December 2020 at 03:50:57 UTC+11 TiddlyTweeter wrote: > Ciao bobj > > Very good case example (http://cultconv.com/ [footnote---on mobile its > too minuscule!]). > > BTW, I really took to your last point ... > > Throughout all of my research career, the issue that continually crops up >> is context. I think this is the crucial component to keep things >> understandable. Yet no agreed understanding of context exists yet we all >> use it ... >> > > Right. In terms of information design issues there is no algorithm for > accurately deriving either "scope of meaning" or "scope of inference > (context implying)". Though it is pretty clear on net that within "fields > of interest" context is ALWAYS playing an implicit role in successful sites. > > I thought the site you gave access to excellent. *Very honed to purpose*. > It is an unusual (uplifting) thing seeing such a "schematization" work so > well. > I think that is the point. You have to "sniff/tease" out context and back > generate (derive) schema from that first-felt understanding that isn't > otherwise derivable. > > Best wishes > TT > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/587ed5db-e27b-4d5a-820f-7497652d30fdn%40googlegroups.com.
