Hi Jeremy, > There are other approaches. We could fork the good parts of TiddlyWiki 5.x > into a new project called Xememex that is less constrained by backwards > compatibility (eg. targeting more modern JavaScript engines). Both the > TiddlyWiki 5 and Xememex projects would proceed independently, allowing end > users to defer or avoid switching over. >
As appealing as this sounds, I just don't think that as a small community we have the resources to support both, unless the intention would be for TiddlyWiki 5 to only receive bug fix updates. As you mention in a later reply, the real challenge is replacing the word tiddler. I remember trying this in Classic and it wasn't easy then and is probably even harder now with all the widget attributes etc. Which makes me wonder if this would really be the best use of our time and resources? Cheers, Saq -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/46fa1057-6405-463e-8ec2-b67532599227n%40googlegroups.com.
