Quinly - sounds friendly as well... On Thursday, December 31, 2020 at 9:49:02 PM UTC+1 clutterstack wrote:
> memexr? I'll see myself out... > > But seriously, I'm more excited about the idea of a new version more > comfortable in its bones with all the things TW can do. Sounds like an > awful lot of work, though. Fun though! But that's my perennial personal > trap. > > I also think Charlie's point below is notable, perhaps more for a > conversation on adoption than on architecting or naming. TiddlyWiki is a > solution all by itself; I have a TW that's been in constant use since 2005, > and it has some customisation in it (most tweaks and plugins were wiped out > when I migrated to TW5), but in general it's a notebook that I shove info > into and that has a search bar. But there's huge untapped (or unpublicised) > potential in the TW with constraints added, presented neatly, for a focused > purpose. > > On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 at 9:13:16 AM UTC-5 Charlie Veniot wrote: > >> >> To me, I wouldn't try convincing folk of using "TiddlyWiki" as a solution >> to a problem. TiddlyWiki is the platform with which I would build the >> solution. The name I then give to the solution is what I use. The name is >> different for every solution. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ac08c949-4c6a-4e93-b773-3c074c521c02n%40googlegroups.com.
