Hi community! Happy new year! I think that we are all clear that TW has a basic unit, the tiddler. We can build our TW with them. We can rename them as *card *, *record*, ..., and then we can rename the project. For example, with tiddler rename as *tile* we can rename TW as *kaleido* or *mosaic*. But then we lose the term of tiddler, the most reconocible part of Tiddlywiki.
Maybe we can rethink about the conexión between our least element (tiddler) and the whole (Tiddlywiki). A shoal is made up of many fish. Is *Shoal *good name? It sound good to me, but i'm not a English-speaking/anglophone. El sábado, 2 de enero de 2021 a las 11:05:22 UTC+1, TiddlyTweeter escribió: > Regarding ideas of CARD or RECORD or variants thereof like "AtomCards" > (i.e. that emphasise the atomistic nature of the "unit"). > > Well. Not sure. I still prefer Tiddler as FRAGMENT. A bit more. > > Why? The problem with "Record" and "Card" is both imply > self-contained-wholeness. Basically echoing database structural units. > > I'd need convincing our "Atomic Units" should be conceptualized that way. > That is NOT how I experience the "fragment" in TW/XEMEMEX. > > It is actually NOT so self-contained or self-substituent. > > Just thoughts > TT > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a07877ae-072c-4d6e-8092-6bf14d5fafeen%40googlegroups.com.
