memexr? I'll see myself out... But seriously, I'm more excited about the idea of a new version more comfortable in its bones with all the things TW can do. Sounds like an awful lot of work, though. Fun though! But that's my perennial personal trap.
I also think Charlie's point below is notable, perhaps more for a conversation on adoption than on architecting or naming. TiddlyWiki is a solution all by itself; I have a TW that's been in constant use since 2005, and it has some customisation in it (most tweaks and plugins were wiped out when I migrated to TW5), but in general it's a notebook that I shove info into and that has a search bar. But there's huge untapped (or unpublicised) potential in the TW with constraints added, presented neatly, for a focused purpose. On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 at 9:13:16 AM UTC-5 Charlie Veniot wrote: > > To me, I wouldn't try convincing folk of using "TiddlyWiki" as a solution > to a problem. TiddlyWiki is the platform with which I would build the > solution. The name I then give to the solution is what I use. The name is > different for every solution. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/823f0660-2c6b-46ca-9ea5-3545ac146be5n%40googlegroups.com.
