You know, chewing on the concept of Incremental note-taking becomes even more interesting in conjunction with chewing on note taking versus note making <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/vlAZ_K4K63o/m/QCW8Czk9AQAJ> .
The intertwingling of it all. The interweaving of the two threads. Kind of mind-blowing. If I smoked weed, me thinks I'd light up a doobie toute suite and wax philosophical for the rest of the day ... On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 4:18:48 PM UTC-3 Si wrote: > I just came across this post: https://thesephist.com/posts/inc/, and it > challenges a lot of my own views on effective note-taking practices, so I > thought it was worth sharing here. > > The author advocates for a kind of chronological system, where as a rule > notes are never updated after they are made, meaning that they retain a > fixed position in time. It kind of reminded me of Soren's random thoughts: > https://randomthoughts.sorenbjornstad.com/ > > Anyway this approach seems completely counter to my current approach to > note-taking, where I want my notes to represent ideas that I am building > over time with little regard to where or when they originally came from. > > I'm not particularly convinced, but I'm curious if anyone here has any > thoughts? Do you see any advantages to this approach? Disadvantages? Do you > think it could gel with the zettelkasten philosophy, or are they polar > opposites? > > Just interested in hearing other peoples thoughts. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/29afad6f-649b-48ad-8363-7afa27f7ae0dn%40googlegroups.com.
