Just a thought: it would be fine if the tagging operator could have a "all"
parameter which would select tiddlers tagging all of the tags in input
(currently, that's "any tag is enough").
Thus we would have a simple and readable solution as:
{{{ [tag1 tag2 tag3 tag4 +[tagging:all[]]] }}}
Le lundi 27 septembre 2021 à 10:58:01 UTC+2, Télumire a écrit :
> Hello all !
> The filter syntax provided by @Álvaro is very neat but doesnt match the
> requirements of cj.v : counting the tiddlers with 4 specifics tags and
> only those tiddlers.
>
> See this screenshot :
>
> https://i.imgur.com/lVlsYZt.png
>
> I think it's because the commas imply an OR condition, but here we want an
> AND :)
>
> So with a a tiny bit of tweaking the correct filter is :
>
> {{{ [[Tag 1][Tag 2][Tag 3][Tag 4]tagging[]]
> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>
> Here's a live demo :
>
>
> https://Telumire.github.io/TW-tips/index.html#:%5B%5B4%20tags%20and%20only%20those%204%5D%5D%5B%5B3%20tags%20+%201%20other%5D%5D%5B%5B4%20tags%20and%20one%20more%5D%5D%5B%5BMultiple%20parameters%20separated%20by%20a%20%20,%20%20character%5D%5D
> Le samedi 25 septembre 2021 à 18:00:37 UTC+2, Álvaro a écrit :
>
>> - In the fields cases we have a workaround with `fields` operator. It has
>> suffixs (exclude, include)
>> - I think that there in't any tiddler with those tags. The search is the
>> tiddler with all these tags (¿and any other?)
>>
>> In the case of titles, you find a issue, but I don't know its reason. I
>> was trying to find a workaround but i wasn't lucky. I also found that the
>> match operator doesn't support multiple parameters.
>>
>> El sábado, 25 de septiembre de 2021 a las 16:30:26 UTC+2, TW Tones
>> escribió:
>>
>>> Of even this {{{ [tag[Common Operators],[HelloThere],[TableOfContents]]
>>> }}}
>>>
>>> On Sunday, 26 September 2021 at 00:27:45 UTC+10 TW Tones wrote:
>>>
>>>> Very interesting.
>>>>
>>>> I think he documentation should be expanded to detail this. Multiple
>>>> parameters to operators are only documented in a few operators, but if I
>>>> read this correctly they can work on operators in *general*?
>>>>
>>>> If general you may expect this to work ```{{{
>>>> [title[tid1],[tid2],[tid3]] }}}``` it does not.
>>>> or {{{ [all[current]get[caption],[description]] }}}``` it does not.
>>>> On Sunday, 26 September 2021 at 00:18:58 UTC+10 Eric Shulman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just tested this on both 5.1.23 and 5.2.0pre. I created one tiddler
>>>>> containing
>>>>> ```
>>>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1],[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>>> ```
>>>>>
>>>>> and another tiddler with the four tags (note capitalization and spaces
>>>>> in the tag values).
>>>>>
>>>>> It *does* seem to work on both versions of TW
>>>>> -e
>>>>> On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 7:02:19 AM UTC-7 TW Tones wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alvaro;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You suggested something like this
>>>>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]**,**[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>>>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as I can see this does not work on the pre-release and the
>>>>>> t6ag format [tag[Tag 1],[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]] (simplified) is not
>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does not work. So I asked if you tested this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, 25 September 2021 at 22:11:48 UTC+10 Álvaro wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know if I understand you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> El sábado, 25 de septiembre de 2021 a las 5:31:18 UTC+2, TW Tones
>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alvaro;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have you tested this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>>>>>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I cant see it working. Here
>>>>>>>> <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Filter%20Parameter> is says
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * NEW IN: 5.1.23 Filter operators support multiple parameters which
>>>>>>>> are separated by a , character.*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *For example: [param1],[param2] or <param1>,{param2}*
>>>>>>>> However as far as I can see only if such multiple parameters are
>>>>>>>> documented in the operator in question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tones
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 25 September 2021 at 01:39:53 UTC+10 Álvaro wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It works fine. I tried to find a alternative, but I wasn't lucky.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When I resee your filter, I remember about the multiple parameters
>>>>>>>>> in filter operator with commas (from last version, 5.1.23). And we
>>>>>>>>> can add
>>>>>>>>> a second filter run that it applies your filter to result of first
>>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>> Then you can rewrite your filter something like this (in filtering
>>>>>>>>> transclusion)
>>>>>>>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>>>>>>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Although maybe it be less understandble for you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> El viernes, 24 de septiembre de 2021 a las 10:59:50 UTC+2,
>>>>>>>>> [email protected] escribió:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's fine by me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And yes filters are fun even if sometimes a bit tricky.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So for the fun of it, you could arrange your filter so that the
>>>>>>>>>> input would be the 4 tags you want.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> something like that:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> \define fun(tags)
>>>>>>>>>> <$set variable=occ filter="[[$tags]....put your filter code
>>>>>>>>>> here...count[]]">Seen <<occ>> tiddlers with tags $tags$</$set>
>>>>>>>>>> \end
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sometimes, this fun has you coding javascript filter operator.
>>>>>>>>>> Would this be the case here? I have not thought about it yet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Le vendredi 24 septembre 2021 à 03:54:34 UTC+2, [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Me and my interest in brain age games, I couldn't help but play
>>>>>>>>>>> around with a filter to find all tiddlers that have all four
>>>>>>>>>>> specified
>>>>>>>>>>> tags, but only those four tags.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You'll find three tiddlers in the attached json. Download the
>>>>>>>>>>> file, and drag into some TiddlyWiki instance (TiddlyWiki.com !) to
>>>>>>>>>>> take a
>>>>>>>>>>> gander.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There are all kinds of ways to go about doing this sort of
>>>>>>>>>>> thing, with some filter operators maybe better suited, but I find
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> result a bit easier for me to understand (more logical to me, or
>>>>>>>>>>> maybe more
>>>>>>>>>>> self-explanatory, because of the way my brain works, I suppose.)
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>>>>>>> just a difference between top-down view vs bottom-up view or
>>>>>>>>>>> something ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I find filters fun.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9b050447-9712-4dd9-a2f3-184f51575bd8n%40googlegroups.com.
