JP,
One way of handling all tags on the current tiddler is not to use the
various tag operators but address the tags field directly.
[all[current]get[tags]] returns the content of the tags field which
includes all tags.
Does this meet with your requirement?
On Monday, 27 September 2021 at 22:08:07 UTC+10 jn.pierr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Just a thought: it would be fine if the tagging operator could have a
> "all" parameter which would select tiddlers tagging all of the tags in
> input (currently, that's "any tag is enough").
>
> Thus we would have a simple and readable solution as:
>
> {{{ [tag1 tag2 tag3 tag4 +[tagging:all[]]] }}}
>
> Le lundi 27 septembre 2021 à 10:58:01 UTC+2, Télumire a écrit :
>
>> Hello all !
>> The filter syntax provided by @Álvaro is very neat but doesnt match the
>> requirements of cj.v : counting the tiddlers with 4 specifics tags and
>> only those tiddlers.
>>
>> See this screenshot :
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/lVlsYZt.png
>>
>> I think it's because the commas imply an OR condition, but here we want
>> an AND :)
>>
>> So with a a tiny bit of tweaking the correct filter is :
>>
>> {{{ [[Tag 1][Tag 2][Tag 3][Tag 4]tagging[]]
>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>
>> Here's a live demo :
>>
>>
>> https://Telumire.github.io/TW-tips/index.html#:%5B%5B4%20tags%20and%20only%20those%204%5D%5D%5B%5B3%20tags%20+%201%20other%5D%5D%5B%5B4%20tags%20and%20one%20more%5D%5D%5B%5BMultiple%20parameters%20separated%20by%20a%20%20,%20%20character%5D%5D
>> Le samedi 25 septembre 2021 à 18:00:37 UTC+2, Álvaro a écrit :
>>
>>> - In the fields cases we have a workaround with `fields` operator. It
>>> has suffixs (exclude, include)
>>> - I think that there in't any tiddler with those tags. The search is the
>>> tiddler with all these tags (¿and any other?)
>>>
>>> In the case of titles, you find a issue, but I don't know its reason. I
>>> was trying to find a workaround but i wasn't lucky. I also found that the
>>> match operator doesn't support multiple parameters.
>>>
>>> El sábado, 25 de septiembre de 2021 a las 16:30:26 UTC+2, TW Tones
>>> escribió:
>>>
>>>> Of even this {{{ [tag[Common Operators],[HelloThere],[TableOfContents]]
>>>> }}}
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, 26 September 2021 at 00:27:45 UTC+10 TW Tones wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Very interesting.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think he documentation should be expanded to detail this. Multiple
>>>>> parameters to operators are only documented in a few operators, but if I
>>>>> read this correctly they can work on operators in *general*?
>>>>>
>>>>> If general you may expect this to work ```{{{
>>>>> [title[tid1],[tid2],[tid3]] }}}``` it does not.
>>>>> or {{{ [all[current]get[caption],[description]] }}}``` it does not.
>>>>> On Sunday, 26 September 2021 at 00:18:58 UTC+10 Eric Shulman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I just tested this on both 5.1.23 and 5.2.0pre. I created one tiddler
>>>>>> containing
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1],[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>>>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and another tiddler with the four tags (note capitalization and
>>>>>> spaces in the tag values).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It *does* seem to work on both versions of TW
>>>>>> -e
>>>>>> On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 7:02:19 AM UTC-7 TW Tones wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alvaro;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You suggested something like this
>>>>>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]**,**[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>>>>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as I can see this does not work on the pre-release and the
>>>>>>> t6ag format [tag[Tag 1],[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]] (simplified) is not
>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does not work. So I asked if you tested this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, 25 September 2021 at 22:11:48 UTC+10 Álvaro wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't know if I understand you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> El sábado, 25 de septiembre de 2021 a las 5:31:18 UTC+2, TW Tones
>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alvaro;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have you tested this?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>>>>>>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I cant see it working. Here
>>>>>>>>> <https://tiddlywiki.com/#Filter%20Parameter> is says
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * NEW IN: 5.1.23 Filter operators support multiple parameters
>>>>>>>>> which are separated by a , character.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *For example: [param1],[param2] or <param1>,{param2}*
>>>>>>>>> However as far as I can see only if such multiple parameters are
>>>>>>>>> documented in the operator in question.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tones
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 25 September 2021 at 01:39:53 UTC+10 Álvaro wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It works fine. I tried to find a alternative, but I wasn't lucky.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When I resee your filter, I remember about the multiple
>>>>>>>>>> parameters in filter operator with commas (from last version,
>>>>>>>>>> 5.1.23). And
>>>>>>>>>> we can add a second filter run that it applies your filter to result
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> first run. Then you can rewrite your filter something like this (in
>>>>>>>>>> filtering transclusion)
>>>>>>>>>> {{{ [tag[Tag 1]*,*[Tag 2],[Tag 3],[Tag 4]]
>>>>>>>>>> :filter[tags[]count[]compare:eq[4]] }}}
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Although maybe it be less understandble for you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> El viernes, 24 de septiembre de 2021 a las 10:59:50 UTC+2,
>>>>>>>>>> jn.pierr...@gmail.com escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's fine by me.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And yes filters are fun even if sometimes a bit tricky.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So for the fun of it, you could arrange your filter so that the
>>>>>>>>>>> input would be the 4 tags you want.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> something like that:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> \define fun(tags)
>>>>>>>>>>> <$set variable=occ filter="[[$tags]....put your filter code
>>>>>>>>>>> here...count[]]">Seen <<occ>> tiddlers with tags $tags$</$set>
>>>>>>>>>>> \end
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sometimes, this fun has you coding javascript filter operator.
>>>>>>>>>>> Would this be the case here? I have not thought about it yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Le vendredi 24 septembre 2021 à 03:54:34 UTC+2,
>>>>>>>>>>> cj.v...@gmail.com a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Me and my interest in brain age games, I couldn't help but play
>>>>>>>>>>>> around with a filter to find all tiddlers that have all four
>>>>>>>>>>>> specified
>>>>>>>>>>>> tags, but only those four tags.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You'll find three tiddlers in the attached json. Download the
>>>>>>>>>>>> file, and drag into some TiddlyWiki instance (TiddlyWiki.com !) to
>>>>>>>>>>>> take a
>>>>>>>>>>>> gander.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There are all kinds of ways to go about doing this sort of
>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, with some filter operators maybe better suited, but I find
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> result a bit easier for me to understand (more logical to me, or
>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe more
>>>>>>>>>>>> self-explanatory, because of the way my brain works, I suppose.)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>> just a difference between top-down view vs bottom-up view or
>>>>>>>>>>>> something ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, I find filters fun.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f4a0de46-a9d7-4c9b-ba3c-a280b5f7f3ean%40googlegroups.com.
