Hi Mike et al, > I use portablefirefox 3.5 (http://www.portableapps.com) on win2k,
Too bad they don't have a portable web-server app. That might future- proof TW. Of course, if you're going to run a web-server, then you could pick just about any Wiki. > Regretfully FF is growing in bloat, but still better > than IE, and better plugin support than chrome. I'm not sure what everyone means by bloat. Any two pieces of software, given the same specifications, will eventually converge upon a similar size and usage. As the user base grows, users demand more and more "must-have" features. Unfortunately one man's "must-have" is another man's "what's that?" feature. > I imagine if all of the major browers close off TW > save capabilities, one of the great dev's will find a > work around. . . And HTML5 is in the works which > should be more future proof (tw5) Can we be sure of that? And is there any reason to believe that HTML5 will be more future-proof, given that javascript will still be a client-side solution with client-side restrictions? Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
